Re: WITH CHECK OPTION bug [was RLS Design]

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>, "Brightwell, Adam" <adam(dot)brightwell(at)crunchydatasolutions(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Yeb Havinga <yeb(dot)havinga(at)portavita(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: WITH CHECK OPTION bug [was RLS Design]
Date: 2014-09-23 00:24:21
Message-ID: 20140923002421.GD16422@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Dean Rasheed (dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> Yeah OK, fair point. Here are some tests that cover that code path.
> I've also thrown in a test with prepared statements, although that
> case was already working, it seemed worth checking.

Applied and backpatched, thanks!

Stephen

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-09-23 00:51:01 Re: Should we excise the remnants of borland cc support?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2014-09-22 23:56:12 Re: Yet another abort-early plan disaster on 9.3