Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes

From: "ktm(at)rice(dot)edu" <ktm(at)rice(dot)edu>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rahila Syed <rahilasyed(dot)90(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Date: 2014-09-11 18:30:11
Message-ID: 20140911183011.GK11672@aart.rice.edu
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 06:58:06PM +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-09-11 12:55:21 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> > I advise supporting pglz only for the initial patch, and adding
> > support for the others later if it seems worthwhile. The approach
> > seems to work well enough with pglz that it's worth doing even if we
> > never add the other algorithms.
>
> That approach is fine with me. Note though that I am pretty strongly
> against adding support for more than one algorithm at the same time. So,
> if we gain lz4 support - which I think is definitely where we should go
> - we should drop pglz support for the WAL.
>
> Greetings,
>
> Andres Freund
>

+1

Regards,
Ken

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message ktm@rice.edu 2014-09-11 18:35:05 Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-09-11 18:14:09 Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes