Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Rahila Syed <rahilasyed(dot)90(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Date: 2014-09-11 16:58:06
Message-ID: 20140911165806.GA15099@alap3.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-09-11 12:55:21 -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> I advise supporting pglz only for the initial patch, and adding
> support for the others later if it seems worthwhile. The approach
> seems to work well enough with pglz that it's worth doing even if we
> never add the other algorithms.

That approach is fine with me. Note though that I am pretty strongly
against adding support for more than one algorithm at the same time. So,
if we gain lz4 support - which I think is definitely where we should go
- we should drop pglz support for the WAL.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2014-09-11 16:58:54 Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-09-11 16:55:21 Re: [REVIEW] Re: Compression of full-page-writes