Re: Specifying the unit in storage parameter

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Specifying the unit in storage parameter
Date: 2014-08-25 18:27:59
Message-ID: 20140825182758.GY6343@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Fujii Masao wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 4:20 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> > Looking at the patch, the parameter "fillfactor" in the category
> > RELOPT_KIND_HEAP (the first element in intRelOpts of reloptions.c) is
> > not updated with the new field. It is only a one-line change.
> > @@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static relopt_int intRelOpts[] =
> > "Packs table pages only to this percentage",
> > RELOPT_KIND_HEAP
> > },
> > - HEAP_DEFAULT_FILLFACTOR, HEAP_MIN_FILLFACTOR, 100
> > + HEAP_DEFAULT_FILLFACTOR, HEAP_MIN_FILLFACTOR, 100, 0
> > },
>
> Oh, good catch. I wonder why I did such a mistake...

Uninitialized elements at end of struct are filled with zeroes. We do
have other examples of this -- for instance, config_generic in the guc.c
tables are almost always only 5 members long even though the struct is
quite a bit longer than that. Most entries do not even have "flags" set.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2014-08-25 18:47:10 Re: [GSoC2014] Patch ALTER TABLE ... SET LOGGED
Previous Message Jeff Janes 2014-08-25 18:25:39 Re: LIMIT for UPDATE and DELETE