Re: Cluster name in ps output

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <munro(at)ip9(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cluster name in ps output
Date: 2014-07-07 16:29:59
Message-ID: 20140707162958.GF6390@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:

> Also, -1 for adding another log_line_prefix escape. If you're routing
> multiple clusters logging to the same place (which is already a bit
> unlikely IMO), you can put distinguishing strings in log_line_prefix
> already. And it's not like we've got an infinite supply of letters
> for those escapes.

FWIW if we find ourselves short on log_line_prefix letters, we can
always invent more verbose notation -- for instance we could have escape
for each GUC var such as %{config:port} for the port number, and so on.
Probably this will be mostly useless for most GUC params, but it might
come in handy for a few of them. And of course we could have more
prefixes apart from "config:".

Not that this affects the current patch in any way.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-07-07 17:23:00 Re: [RFC: bug fix?] Connection attempt block forever when the synchronous standby is not running
Previous Message Tom Lane 2014-07-07 16:28:10 Re: Allowing join removals for more join types