Re: Cluster name in ps output

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <munro(at)ip9(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Cluster name in ps output
Date: 2014-05-05 15:37:53
Message-ID: 20140505153753.GB27783@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-05-05 08:03:04 -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> Craig,
>
> * Craig Ringer (craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com) wrote:
> > postgres[5433]: checkpointer process
> >
> > at least as useful. The only time that's not unique is in a BSD jail or
> > lxc container, and in those cases IIRC ps can show you the
> > jail/container anyway.
>
> Uhh, that's not at all true. You can trivially have multiple IPs on a
> box w/o jails or containers (aliased interfaces) and then run PG on the
> default port- which I find to be *far* more convenient than having the
> same IP and a bunch of different ports.

Only that you then need different socket directories. Do you really do
that regularly?

Anyway, I am happy having the cluster_name thingy.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-05-05 15:39:37 Re: Cluster name in ps output
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-05-05 15:36:20 Re: Cluster name in ps output