Re: Where do we stand on 9.3 bugs?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: Where do we stand on 9.3 bugs?
Date: 2014-01-13 16:05:51
Message-ID: 20140113160551.GC6840@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2014-01-13 12:26:45 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > What remaining issues are there blocking a 9.3.3 release? I know that
> > > there were unresolved multixact issues when we put out 9.3.2 --- are
> > > those all dealt with now? What else do people see as release-blockers?
> >
> > The only thing I'm aware still outstanding in multixact land is the
> > creation of a separate multixact freeze age GUC variable. All other
> > issues were resolved. Bug #8470 is still unresolved, but that's a
> > performance issue.
>
> It's not strictly a 9.3 issue, but there's still the issue of /members
> wrapping around into valid data, right?

Yes, but TBH I don't have much of an intention to fix that other than
having the freeze limit. At least not for 9.3.3.

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Oleg Bartunov 2014-01-13 16:16:15 Re: nested hstore patch
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-01-13 16:03:31 Re: nested hstore patch