Re: nested hstore patch

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, david(at)justatheory(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: nested hstore patch
Date: 2014-01-13 16:03:31
Message-ID: 20140113160331.GB6840@eldon.alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan wrote:
>
> On 01/13/2014 03:25 AM, Erik Rijkers wrote:
>
> >There are errors in the example expressions in "Table F-6. hstore Operators".
> >
> >Attached is a cumulative doc-patch (which includes the changes I sent earlier) which fixes these.
> >
> >I also attach an test perl program that shows the (small) differences in output between what's in that doc table and what
> >one actually gets. (I found these too insignificant to change but perhaps you have a different opinion.)
>
>
> A new version of the patch is attached. It includes all of Erik's
> docs fixes and a small fix by Alexander Korotkov for hstore hash
> ops.

Interestingly, this also include transaction_commit event triggers.

There are also a few PANIC elogs, probably not what's intended.

(I was just giving this a quick skim to see if there's support to build
JSON objects incrementally from C source, i.e. not have to call
functions using the fmgr interface. Apparently that's not the case, but
if I'm wrong please let me know.)

--
Álvaro Herrera http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2014-01-13 16:05:51 Re: Where do we stand on 9.3 bugs?
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-01-13 15:55:26 Re: Where do we stand on 9.3 bugs?