Re: Proposal: variant of regclass

From: Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: vik(dot)fearing(at)dalibo(dot)com
Cc: ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pavel(at)gf(dot)microolap(dot)com, pavel(at)microolap(dot)com, andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com
Subject: Re: Proposal: variant of regclass
Date: 2013-12-31 04:58:42
Message-ID: 20131231.135842.841351738632131903.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 12/31/2013 02:38 AM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
>> Before proceeding the work, I would like to make sure that followings
>> are complete list of new functions. Inside parentheses are
>> corresponding original functions.
>>
>> toregproc (regproc)
>> toregoper (regoper)
>> toregclass (regclass)
>> toregtype (regtype)
>
> Pardon the bikeshedding, but those are hard to read for me. I would
> prefer to go with the to_timestamp() model and add an underscore to
> those names.

I have no problem with adding "to_". Objection?

Best regards,
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mark Dilger 2013-12-31 05:26:33 fix_PGSTAT_NUM_TABENTRIES_macro patch
Previous Message Amit Kapila 2013-12-31 04:11:16 Re: [PATCH] Regression tests in windows ignore white space