Re: Errors on missing pg_subtrans/ files with 9.3

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: J Smith <dark(dot)panda+lists(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Errors on missing pg_subtrans/ files with 9.3
Date: 2013-11-12 16:32:14
Message-ID: 20131112163214.GF23777@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-11-12 11:25:03 -0500, Stephen Frost wrote:
> * J Smith (dark(dot)panda+lists(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > I've recently upgraded a number of servers from PostgreSQL 9.2.5 to
> > 9.3.1 and have started getting the following errors every couple of
> > hours along with some failed transactions.
>
> How was this upgrade done? If you used pg_upgrade, what version of the
> pg_upgrade code did you use? As I recall, there was a bug in older
> versions which could exhibit in this way..

He referred to using pg_dumpall/pg_dump. But that bug was erroring out
on pg_clog, not pg_subtrans, right?

Getting such errors on pg_subtrans indicates corruption or a bug
somewhere, we don't do them if the to-be-looked up xid is older than
TransactionXmin and we zero pg_subtrans at restarts.

My gut feeling is thats it's related to foreign key locks doing
XactLockTableWait()s on too old transactions or something like that.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message J Smith 2013-11-12 16:32:34 Re: Errors on missing pg_subtrans/ files with 9.3
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-11-12 16:29:51 Re: What's needed for cache-only table scan?