Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK
Date: 2013-10-23 01:20:10
Message-ID: 20131023012010.GD823737@alap2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-10-23 03:18:55 +0200, Andres Freund wrote:
> (000[1-4])

Attached.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

Attachment Content-Type Size
0001-debug-lock-on-index-without-heap-lock.patch text/x-patch 5.5 KB
0002-Acquire-appropriate-locks-when-rewriting-during-REFR.patch text/x-patch 1.4 KB
0003-hack-INSERT-INTO-some_view-to-lock-rels-in-the-under.patch text/x-patch 1.3 KB
0004-matview-lock-temp-table-till-tx-end-during-refresh-f.patch text/x-patch 993 bytes

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KONDO Mitsumasa 2013-10-23 01:35:51 Re: Compression of full-page-writes
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-10-23 01:18:55 missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK