From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK |
Date: | 2013-10-23 01:18:55 |
Message-ID: | 20131023011855.GC823737@alap2.anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Using the same debugging hack^Wpatch (0001) as in the matview patch
(0002) an hour or so ago I noticed that INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK
doesn't lock the underlying relations properly.
I've attached a sort-of-working (0003) hack but I really doubt it's the
correct approach, I don't really know enough about that area of the
code.
This looks like something that needs to be fixed.
Also attached is 0004 which just adds a heap_lock() around a newly
created temporary table in the matview code which shouldn't be required
for correctness but gives warm and fuzzy feelings as well as less
debugging noise.
Wouldn't it be a good idea to tack such WARNINGs (in a proper and clean
form) to index_open (checking the underlying relation is locked),
relation_open(..., NoLock) (checking the relation has previously been
locked) and maybe RelationIdGetRelation() when cassert is enabled? ISTM
we frequently had bugs around this.
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andres Freund | 2013-10-23 01:20:10 | Re: missing locking in at least INSERT INTO view WITH CHECK |
Previous Message | Noah Misch | 2013-10-23 01:05:33 | Re: Why the asprintf patch is still breaking the buildfarm |