Re: ToDo: fast update of arrays with fixed length fields for PL/pgSQL

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ToDo: fast update of arrays with fixed length fields for PL/pgSQL
Date: 2013-10-07 14:05:51
Message-ID: 20131007140551.GE15202@awork2.anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2013-10-07 16:00:54 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> /*
> * We need to do subscript evaluation, which might require
> @@ -4321,6 +4322,14 @@ exec_assign_value(PLpgSQL_execstate *estate,
> oldarrayval = (ArrayType *) DatumGetPointer(oldarraydatum);
>
> /*
> + * support fast update for array scalar variable is enabled only
> + * when target is a scalar variable and variable holds a local
> + * copy of some array.
> + */
> + inplace_update = (((PLpgSQL_datum *) target)->dtype == PLPGSQL_DTYPE_VAR
> + && ((PLpgSQL_var *) target)->freeval);
> +
> + /*
> * Build the modified array value.
> */

Will this recognize if the local Datum is just a reference to an
external toast Datum (i.e. varattrib_1b_e)?

I don't know much about plpgsql's implementation, so please excuse if
the question is stupid.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-10-07 14:07:16 Re: SSI freezing bug
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2013-10-07 14:00:54 Re: ToDo: fast update of arrays with fixed length fields for PL/pgSQL