Re: logical changeset generation v6.2

On 2013-10-07 09:56:11 -0400, Steve Singer wrote:
> On 10/03/2013 04:00 PM, Andres Freund wrote:
> >Ok, there were a couple of bugs because I thought mxacts wouldn't need to
> >be supported. So far your testcase doesn't crash the database anymore - it
> >spews some internal errors though, so I am not sure if it's entirely fixed
> >for you. Thanks for testing and helping! I've pushed the changes to the
> >git tree, they aren't squashed yet and there's some further outstanding
> >stuff, so I won't repost the series yet. Greetings, Andres Freund
> When I run your updated version (from friday, not what you posted today)
> against a more recent version of my slony changes I can get the test case to
> pass 2/3 'rd of the time. The failures are due to an issue in slon itself
> that I need to fix.

Cool.

> I see lots of
> 0LOG: tx with subtxn 58836

Yes, those are completely harmless. And should, in fact, be removed. I
guess I should add the todo entry:
* make a pass over all elog/ereport an make sure they have the correct
log level et al.

Greetings,

Andres Freund

--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services