Re: C++ compiler

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Claudio Freire <klaussfreire(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: C++ compiler
Date: 2013-06-25 00:37:26
Message-ID: 20130625003726.GC14698@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 09:21:26PM -0300, Claudio Freire wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 9:19 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think the big question is whether you can _control_ what C++ features
> >> are used, or whether you are perpetually instructing users what C++
> >> features not to use.
> >
> >
> > How is that different than us having to do the same with C?
>
>
> Perhaps the size of C++ ?

Right. I don't think there are any C features we want to avoid; are
there any?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2013-06-25 01:02:53 Re: request a new feature in fuzzystrmatch
Previous Message Josh Kupershmidt 2013-06-25 00:34:43 Re: pg_filedump 9.3: checksums (and a few other fixes)