Re: Re: Doc patch making firm recommendation for setting the value of commit_delay

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: Doc patch making firm recommendation for setting the value of commit_delay
Date: 2013-03-18 19:07:24
Message-ID: 20130318190724.GE16641@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 05:47:30PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm marking this patch Ready for Committer, qualified with a recommendation to
> > adopt only the wal.sgml changes.
>
> I've committed this along with some further wordsmithing. I kept
> Peter's change to pg_test_fsync's default -s value; I've always felt
> that 2 seconds was laughably small. It might be all right for very
> quick-and-dirty tests, but as a default value, it seems like a poor
> choice, because it's at the very bottom of the credible range of
> choices.

Agreed, 2 seconds was at the bottom. The old behavior was very slow so
I went low. Now that we are using it, 5 secs makes sense.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2013-03-18 19:25:55 Re: Enabling Checksums
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-03-18 19:06:18 Re: Enabling Checksums