Re: FILTER for aggregates [was Re: Department of Redundancy Department: makeNode(FuncCall) division]

On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 06:45:31AM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 09, 2013 at 11:59:22PM -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> > Folks,
> >
> > Per suggestions and lots of help from Andrew Gierth, please find
> > attached a patch to clean up the call sites for FuncCall nodes, which
> > I'd like to expand centrally rather than in each of the 37 (or 38, but
> > I only redid 37) places where it's called. The remaining one is in
> > src/backend/nodes/copyfuncs.c, which has to be modified for any
> > changes in the that struct anyhow.
> >
> > The immediate purpose is two-fold: to reduce some redundancies, which
> > I believe is worth doing in and of itself, and to prepare for adding
> > FILTER on aggregates from the spec, and possibly other things in
> > the <aggregate function> part of the spec.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > David.
>
> Folks,
>
> Please find attached two versions of a patch which provides optional
> FILTER clause for aggregates (T612, "Advanced OLAP operations").
>
> The first is intended to be applied on top of the previous patch, the
> second without it.

I'll find a brown paper back to wear over my head at some point, but
meanwhile, here's a cleaned-up version of the patch that doesn't use
makeFuncArgs, now without merge artifacts and with the ability to
actually compile. It's still WIP in the sense previously mentioned.

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate