On Sunday 21 October 2012, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
> At 2012-10-21 11:49:26 -0400, cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
> > If there is a natural sequence (e.g. - a value assigned by nextval()),
> > that offers a natural place to apply the usual order-imposing ORDER BY
> > that we are expected to use elsewhere.
>
> Note: "INSERT … RETURNING" doesn't accept an ORDER BY clause.
Exactly. And IMHO it should never have.
The real trouble is when you insert some arbitrary values, which have no
implicit order or primary key /before/ the insert will assign them one. Then,
you need to map them to the SERIAL they got.
Or else, you can't use the multi-row INSERT and must just do many INSERTs.
--
Say NO to spam and viruses. Stop using Microsoft Windows!