Quick Links

Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows

From:	Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To:	Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc:	pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject:	Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows
Date:	2012-10-21 16:20:08
Message-ID:	20121021162008.GA27531@toroid.org
Views:	Raw Message \| Whole Thread \| Download mbox \| Resend email
Thread:
Lists:	pgsql-hackers

At 2012-10-21 11:49:26 -0400, cbbrowne(at)gmail(dot)com wrote:
>
> If there is a natural sequence (e.g. - a value assigned by nextval()),
> that offers a natural place to apply the usual order-imposing ORDER BY
> that we are expected to use elsewhere.

Note: "INSERT … RETURNING" doesn't accept an ORDER BY clause.

-- Abhijit

In response to

Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows at 2012-10-21 15:49:26 from Christopher Browne

Responses

Re: Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows at 2012-10-21 16:30:14 from Andrew Dunstan
Re: Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows at 2012-10-21 16:40:33 from P. Christeas
Re: Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows at 2012-10-21 20:29:39 from Vik Reykja

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

	From	Date	Subject
Next Message	Andrew Dunstan	2012-10-21 16:30:14	Re: Re: [PATCH] Enforce that INSERT...RETURNING preserves the order of multi rows
Previous Message	Kevin Grittner	2012-10-21 15:59:30	Re: No, pg_size_pretty(numeric) was not such a hot idea