| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "<pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Word-smithing doc changes |
| Date: | 2012-08-03 13:59:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20120803135936.GA29664@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 12:26:56AM -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> The concurrent index documentation under discussion above was never
> updated, so I took a stab at it, attached.
>
> Greg, I looked at adding a mention of the virtual transaction wait to
> the "explicit-locking" section as you suggested, and found those were
> all user-visible locking, while this is internal locking. I did find a
> clear description of transaction id locking in the pg_locks system view
> docs, so I just referenced that.
I found a way to clarify the wording further; patch attached.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| concurrent.diff | text/x-diff | 1.6 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2012-08-03 14:03:18 | Re: WIP pgindent replacement |
| Previous Message | Craig Ringer | 2012-08-03 13:55:42 | [PATCH] Docs: Make notes on sequences and rollback more obvious |