Re: mvcc & DML on the same row

From: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, matteo durighetto <desmodemone(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: mvcc & DML on the same row
Date: 2010-12-16 14:18:20
Message-ID: 201012161518.20871.andres@anarazel.de
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thursday 16 December 2010 15:11:01 Simon Riggs wrote:
> In order to remove X1 we would need to change X0 to point to X2, which
> we don't do because we're not allowed to update in place. Even if we
> could, I'm not sure this case is frequent enough to be worth the effort.
Especially as X3 would need to fit into X2's space for it to be beneficial...

Andres

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2010-12-16 14:24:22 Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files)
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-12-16 14:16:26 Re: Re: Proposed Windows-specific change: Enable crash dumps (like core files)