Re: Adding support for SE-Linux security

Robert Haas wrote:
> > I offered to review it. ?I was going to mostly review the parts that
> > impacted our existing code, and I wasn't going to be able to do a
> > thorough job of the SE-Linux-specific files.
>
> Review it and commit it, after making whatever modifications are
> necessary? Or review it in part, leaving the final review and commit
> to someone else?
>
> I just read through the latest version of this patch and it does
> appear to be in significantly better shape than the versions I read
> back in July. So it might not require a Herculean feat of strength to
> get this in, but I still think it's going to be a big job. There's a
> lot of code here that needs to be verified and in some cases probably
> cleaned up or restructured. If you're prepared to take it on, I'm not
> going to speak against that, other than to say that I think you have
> your work cut out for you.

This is no harder than many of the other seemingly crazy things I have
done, e.g. Win32 port, client library threading. If this is a feature
we should have, I will get it done or get others to help me complete the
task.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +