From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, decibel <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, "Jonah H(dot) Harris" <jonah(dot)harris(at)gmail(dot)com>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
Date: | 2009-12-04 14:48:30 |
Message-ID: | 20091204144830.GE4705@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas escribió:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
> > On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 09:52 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> >
> >> BTW with VACUUM FULL removed I assume we're going to get rid of
> >> HEAP_MOVED_IN and HEAP_MOVED_OFF too, right?
> >
> > Much as I would like to see those go, no. VF code should remain for some
> > time yet, IMHO.
>
> I don't think we need to keep VF code otherwise, but I would leave
> HEAP_MOVED_IN/OFF support alone for now for in-place upgrade. Otherwise
> we need a pre-upgrade script or something to scrub them off.
CRCs are going to need scrubbing anyway, no? Oh, but you're assuming
that CRCs are optional, so not everybody would need that, right?
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2009-12-04 15:00:00 | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2009-12-04 14:46:01 | Re: Block-level CRC checks |