| From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal |
| Date: | 2009-10-05 15:40:59 |
| Message-ID: | 20091005154059.GD4940@fetter.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 11:28:13AM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Dan Colish wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 09:50:18AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > > On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 18:24 -0700, Dan Colish wrote:
>
> > > > You can definitely create updatable views using rules.
> > >
> > > Sure you can, but they won't work in various significant corner cases.
> > >
> > > Search the archives for "updatable views" for details.
> >
> > I don't even want updatable views!
>
> Why would you argue that point? They are specified in the SQL
> standard somewhere.
Feature T111, described in sections 15.9, 15.12 and 15.15 of SQL:2008,
in particular.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2009-10-05 15:43:26 | Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal |
| Previous Message | Dan Colish | 2009-10-05 15:37:15 | Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal |