From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal |
Date: | 2009-10-05 15:28:13 |
Message-ID: | 20091005152813.GB5176@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Dan Colish wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 05, 2009 at 09:50:18AM +0300, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> > On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 18:24 -0700, Dan Colish wrote:
> > > You can definitely create updatable views using rules.
> >
> > Sure you can, but they won't work in various significant corner cases.
> >
> > Search the archives for "updatable views" for details.
>
> I don't even want updatable views!
Why would you argue that point? They are specified in the SQL standard
somewhere.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Emmanuel Cecchet | 2009-10-05 15:30:48 | Re: COPY enhancements |
Previous Message | Dan Colish | 2009-10-05 15:20:24 | Re: Rules: A Modest Proposal |