Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql with "Function Type" in \df
Date: 2009-04-14 19:04:55
Message-ID: 20090414190455.GV7709@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

David Fetter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 02:52:32PM -0400, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

> > I think it's good to have them translatable. As for using
> > "aggregate" instead of "agg" I don't think it's that great an idea.
> > If you need to notify translators that "agg" stands for "aggregate",
> > add a /* translator: */ comment.
>
> Where would I add that? First mention, each time, or...?

Is there more than one mention of "agg"?

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Meredith L. Patterson 2009-04-14 19:07:57 Re: Unicode string literals versus the world
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-04-14 19:00:15 Re: Unicode string literals versus the world