Re: small but useful patches for text search

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: small but useful patches for text search
Date: 2009-03-17 15:21:37
Message-ID: 200903171621.40600.dfontaine@hi-media.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

It's not like my opinion has any weight but still,

On Tuesday 17 March 2009 16:15:21 Robert Haas wrote:
> either make the release happen on time, or we can get all of the
> patches reviewed, but we can only do both if the committers have the
> time and energy to make that happen. Do you disagree?

Sure I do.
You can either have time based release or feature based one. Full stop.

That do not depend on time and energy of people involved, nor to their role in
the community (contributor, reviewer, commiter, beta tester, etc)

Regards,
--
dim

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chuck McDevitt 2009-03-17 15:38:06 Solaris getopt_long and PostgreSQL
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2009-03-17 15:18:52 Re: small but useful patches for text search