Re: TABLE command

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TABLE command
Date: 2008-11-18 15:32:06
Message-ID: 20081118153206.GB24041@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 04:01:58PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Hmm. Given the current infrastructure for \h, the only way to do
>> that would be to make a separate ref page for WITH, which feels
>> like the wrong thing. And the objection I have to TABLE is not the
>> code but the apparent need to give it its own ref page (as we
>> already did for VALUES, and I found that pretty ugly too).
>>
>> Is there a way to make all of these point at the SELECT ref page?
>
> I was looking into that and I figured using the \G expression in
> Perl REs would be useful for this (to find multiple <refname>s).
> But this was introduced in Perl 5.000, and we claim to support Perl
> 4 in create_help.pl. I recall that you Tom once arranged this to
> support building on some old machines. Is this still relevant?

No. The last release of Perl 4 was in 1993. People born since then
are probably hacking PostgreSQL right now.

> Or can someone advise on an alternative way to code this?

Leave Perl 4 support out. :)

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2008-11-18 15:36:59 Re: TABLE command
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2008-11-18 15:31:31 Re: Re: toast by chunk-end (was Re: PG_PAGE_LAYOUT_VERSION 5 - time for change)