| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: TABLE command |
| Date: | 2008-11-18 15:36:59 |
| Message-ID: | 19640.1227022619@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 04:01:58PM +0200, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I was looking into that and I figured using the \G expression in
>> Perl REs would be useful for this (to find multiple <refname>s).
>> But this was introduced in Perl 5.000, and we claim to support Perl
>> 4 in create_help.pl. I recall that you Tom once arranged this to
>> support building on some old machines. Is this still relevant?
> No.
I concur, there isn't likely to be much demand for building PG >= 8.4
with Perl 4.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2008-11-18 15:37:44 | Re: is any reason why only one columns subselect are allowed in array()? |
| Previous Message | David Fetter | 2008-11-18 15:32:06 | Re: TABLE command |