Re: WIP patch: Collation support

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Radek Strnad <radek(dot)strnad(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: WIP patch: Collation support
Date: 2008-09-23 10:32:07
Message-ID: 20080923103207.GC6986@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 06:11:04PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >This patch should allow to use both system catalog and ICU.
>
> Not without another patch that actually introduces ICU support. What
> that would look like, how that would be stored in the catalogs, and
> whether we want that is whole another topic. Without that, the STRCOLFN
> part of the original patch is pointless, and I would've ripped that out
> anyway even if we decided to add the pg_collation catalog in this release.

Eh? How you store collations names is easy. Every collation has a
textual name which is what we store in the catalog. I'm not sure why
you'd think it'd be any more complicated than that. And it has
precisely nothing to do with ICU and everything to do with being able
to support multiple source of collation information. We already have
two: builtin (strcmp/memcmp) and C library (strcoll). Letting peope add
more is the goal.

I'm sure once the catalog exists the existing ICU-for-Postgres patch
will be adjusted to use it.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while
> boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2008-09-23 10:32:38 Re: WIP patch: Collation support
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2008-09-23 10:26:52 Re: WIP patch: Collation support