| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dawid Kuroczko <qnex42(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: psql \G command -- send query and output using extended format |
| Date: | 2008-04-05 00:43:00 |
| Message-ID: | 200804050043.m350h0m14145@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Dawid Kuroczko wrote:
> 2. Do we want \G? I would say "yes". ;) But it should get discussed.
> pgsql-general perhaps?
No. We have had little demand for the auto, let alone a \G. Once we
have auto I don't see a use for \G.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-05 00:47:26 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement current_query(), that shows the currently executing |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-05 00:40:26 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Implement current_query(), that shows the currently executing |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2008-04-05 01:34:58 | Re: [HACKERS] Minor changes to Recovery related code |
| Previous Message | Joe Conway | 2008-04-05 00:12:34 | Re: libpq type system 0.9a |