From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch |
Date: | 2008-04-03 05:02:29 |
Message-ID: | 20080402220229.79b10840@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-patches |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 00:57:11 -0400
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> The fundamental problem I've got with this patch is that it adds
> >> 400K of new code (and that's just the code, not counting
> >> documentation or regression tests) that we'll have to maintain, to
> >> obtain a feature that so far as I've heard there is precisely zero
> >> demand for.
>
> > That is likely because everyone knew he was working on it.
>
> By "everyone" I suppose you mean the dozen or three people who are
> paying close attention to who's doing what in PG development.
Well I think that is a bit of an understatement. I know that I have
talked to people about this patch for some time. Even well before 8.3
came out.
> I'm not against having SQL/PSM support. I'm just saying I'm not
> willing to support two copies of plpgsql to do it.
I didn't disagree with you Tom.
Joshua D. Drake
- --
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFH9GTnATb/zqfZUUQRAlaqAJ0bU/N625e5+BoVQRepETsU4Lij5gCfQ5qo
xOqTAATx8P9AW7ZKE0qAE+I=
=g2v9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-03 05:04:15 | Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-04-03 04:57:11 | Re: actualized SQL/PSM patch |