Re: RFC: Temporal Extensions for PostgreSQL

From: Warren Turkal <wt(at)penguintechs(dot)org>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: RFC: Temporal Extensions for PostgreSQL
Date: 2007-02-17 18:40:44
Message-ID: 200702171140.44775.wt@penguintechs.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Saturday 17 February 2007 09:26, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Overlapping" is not an equality relation (it fails the transitive law),
> so I'm not entirely sure what "unique" means in this context ... but I
> can promise you you can't make it work with btree.

There is an equality relation on periods. But it wouldn't really tell you much
useful info, as it's not normally what you're looking for with time.

wt
--
Warren Turkal (w00t)

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Warren Turkal 2007-02-17 18:41:03 Re: RFC: Temporal Extensions for PostgreSQL
Previous Message Michael Fuhr 2007-02-17 18:31:19 Re: [ANNOUNCE] Advisory on possibly insecure security definer functions