Re: PostgreSQL win32 fragmentation issue

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL win32 fragmentation issue
Date: 2006-12-02 16:34:53
Message-ID: 20061202163453.GC11525@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote:

> My concern is that this is over a single bench run. I could imagine that
> after a week or two weeks of stead PostgreSQL use, the IO would
> gradually get worse and worse.

Well, we mostly do random reads (seek) all the time anyway, so is this
really a concern?

Are you using NTFS or FAT? You didn't answer that question.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-12-02 16:36:04 Re: PostgreSQL win32 fragmentation issue
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2006-12-02 16:34:04 Re: PostgreSQL win32 fragmentation issue