| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL win32 fragmentation issue |
| Date: | 2006-12-02 16:41:18 |
| Message-ID: | 1165077678.18923.9.camel@localhost.localdomain |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2006-12-02 at 13:34 -0300, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> > My concern is that this is over a single bench run. I could imagine that
> > after a week or two weeks of stead PostgreSQL use, the IO would
> > gradually get worse and worse.
>
> Well, we mostly do random reads (seek) all the time anyway, so is this
> really a concern?
Wouldn't it be for writes?
>
> Are you using NTFS or FAT? You didn't answer that question.
NTFS of course :) (sorry).
Joshua D. Drake
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2006-12-02 16:43:27 | Re: PostgreSQL win32 fragmentation issue |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2006-12-02 16:36:04 | Re: PostgreSQL win32 fragmentation issue |