Re: [GENERAL] Allowing SYSDATE to Work

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, Matt Miller <pgsql(at)mattmillersf(dot)fastmail(dot)fm>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Allowing SYSDATE to Work
Date: 2006-11-18 07:47:21
Message-ID: 200611180847.22042.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> Matt Miller wrote:
> > Yeah, and I don't expect that they'll be a rush to commit this to
> > head anytime soon. I'll be happy enough tracking this locally. I
> > think it's a win for my situation.
>
> Why should we add this Oraclism to PostgreSQL? I doesn't add any new
> feature.

Certainly, this feature falls well within the class of completely
gratuitous proprietary extensions that we typically reject.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message gustavo halperin 2006-11-18 09:32:08 wxWidgets and arrays
Previous Message Tom Lane 2006-11-18 06:01:58 Re: [GENERAL] Shutting down a warm standby database in 8.2beta3

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2006-11-18 10:35:33 Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch'sconfiguration
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2006-11-18 07:37:33 Re: Proposal: syntax of operation with tsearch's configuration