Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq

From: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq
Date: 2006-05-04 18:33:44
Message-ID: 20060504183344.GL4752@svana.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 12:47:39PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> > Comparing the lists of functions exported by libpq and those declared
> > by libpq-fe.h turns up a fair number of descrepancies. Most of these
> > functions are declared by internal header files. For clarity I think we
> > should clarify the situation, either explicity declare them for
> > external users, or stop exporting them. Now that we've bumped the major
> > version of libpq, now is the perfect time to decide.
>
> Already done no? (at least on the platforms where we know how to
> restrict it)

These functions are all in the exports.txt. I was just wondering if we
wanted to cut that list down any more...

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> http://svana.org/kleptog/
> From each according to his ability. To each according to his ability to litigate.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Hallgren 2006-05-04 19:02:02 Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2006-05-04 17:38:23 Re: patch review, please: Autovacuum/Vacuum times via stats.