Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Semi-undocumented functions in libpq
Date: 2006-05-04 16:47:39
Message-ID: 10626.1146761259@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> Comparing the lists of functions exported by libpq and those declared
> by libpq-fe.h turns up a fair number of descrepancies. Most of these
> functions are declared by internal header files. For clarity I think we
> should clarify the situation, either explicity declare them for
> external users, or stop exporting them. Now that we've bumped the major
> version of libpq, now is the perfect time to decide.

Already done no? (at least on the platforms where we know how to
restrict it)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-05-04 17:02:39 Re: pseudo-type record arguments for PL-functions
Previous Message Greg Stark 2006-05-04 16:47:09 Re: Warts with SELECT DISTINCT