Re: statement_timeout

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Marcin Mańk <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: statement_timeout
Date: 2006-11-16 18:50:00
Message-ID: 20058.1163703000@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

=?iso-8859-2?Q?Marcin_Ma=F1k?= <marcin(dot)mank(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I have an unconfirmed feeling that autovac does not like system-wide
> statement_timeout.

If you have it set to less than the time needed to do a vacuum, then
yes, autovac will fail. You expected differently? Do you think it's
a good idea for autovac to ignore statement_timeout? (Maybe it is,
but I suspect we'd get complaints about that too.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2006-11-16 18:53:37 Re: Partial index
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2006-11-16 18:47:48 Re: Why the data changes it's value by itself!

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message luis garcia 2006-11-16 19:21:37 # of tuples on a Table?
Previous Message Jerry Sievers 2006-11-16 18:44:03 Re: statement_timeout