Re: Postgresql replication

From: Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql replication
Date: 2005-08-25 20:05:19
Message-ID: 20050825200519.GB23397@gp.word-to-the-wise.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 12:20:52PM -0400, Chris Browne wrote:

> bohdan(dot)linda(at)seznam(dot)cz (Bohdan Linda) writes:
> > I would have a slight offtopic question, this is issue only of pgsql or
> > there are some other db solutions which have good performance when doing
> > this kind of replication across the world.
>
> Asynchronous multimaster replication is pretty much a generally tough
> problem.
>
> Oracle, Sybase, and DB2 all have methods of doing it; none are either
> simple, straightforward, or transparent to use.
>
> It's a tough problem, in general.

I've been involved in one project that did multi-master async replication
across geographically separated servers.

It worked but was operationally so horrible that I've sworn never to
architect a system that requires multi-master replication at the
database ever again. Application level? Possibly. But not at the DB
level.

Cheers,
Steve

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruno Wolff III 2005-08-25 20:13:00 Re: Help with a subselect inside a view
Previous Message Matt Miller 2005-08-25 19:54:49 Re: Postgresql replication