From: | Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Postgresql replication |
Date: | 2005-08-25 20:05:19 |
Message-ID: | 20050825200519.GB23397@gp.word-to-the-wise.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 12:20:52PM -0400, Chris Browne wrote:
> bohdan(dot)linda(at)seznam(dot)cz (Bohdan Linda) writes:
> > I would have a slight offtopic question, this is issue only of pgsql or
> > there are some other db solutions which have good performance when doing
> > this kind of replication across the world.
>
> Asynchronous multimaster replication is pretty much a generally tough
> problem.
>
> Oracle, Sybase, and DB2 all have methods of doing it; none are either
> simple, straightforward, or transparent to use.
>
> It's a tough problem, in general.
I've been involved in one project that did multi-master async replication
across geographically separated servers.
It worked but was operationally so horrible that I've sworn never to
architect a system that requires multi-master replication at the
database ever again. Application level? Possibly. But not at the DB
level.
Cheers,
Steve
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2005-08-25 20:13:00 | Re: Help with a subselect inside a view |
Previous Message | Matt Miller | 2005-08-25 19:54:49 | Re: Postgresql replication |