| From: | Bohdan Linda <bohdan(dot)linda(at)seznam(dot)cz> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Postgresql replication |
| Date: | 2005-08-25 11:44:15 |
| Message-ID: | 20050825114411.GA30455@bafster.chello.upc.cz |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
I would have a slight offtopic question, this is issue only of pgsql or
there are some other db solutions which have good performance when doing
this kind of replication across the world.
Regards,
Bohdan
On Thu, Aug 25, 2005 at 09:01:49AM +0200, William Yu wrote:
> It provides pseudo relief if all your servers are in the same building.
> Having a front-end pgpool connector pointing to servers across the world
> is not workable -- performance ends up being completely decrepit due to
> the high latency.
>
> Which is the problem we face. Great, you've got multiple servers for
> failover. Too bad it doesn't do much good if your building gets hit by
> fire/earthquake/hurricane/etc.
>
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tino Wildenhain | 2005-08-25 11:50:48 | Re: Postgresql replication |
| Previous Message | Ben-Nes Yonatan | 2005-08-25 09:21:41 | Re: Query results caching? |