Re: TODO questions

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: TODO questions
Date: 2005-08-24 20:34:12
Message-ID: 200508242034.j7OKYCL09630@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


OK, additional sentence removed.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> > OK, TODO updated:
> > o %Allow commenting of variables in postgresql.conf to restore them
> > to defaults
>
> > Currently, if a variable is commented out, it keeps the
> > previous uncommented value until a server restarted.
> > Logically, a reload should set the same values as a
> > server restart.
>
> That all sounds nice, but unless you intend to fix all the constraints
> that force some values to be set-only-at-postmaster-start, it's never
> going to be possible to promise that a reload has the same effect as
> restarting the server. We could do this for values that are not
> PGC_POSTMASTER, but the argument given above for doing it is bogus.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

--
Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us
pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 359-1001
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road
+ Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Treat 2005-08-24 20:38:41 Re: TODO questions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-08-24 20:24:10 Re: static libperl?