Large time difference between explain analyze and normal run

From: Chris Kratz <chris(dot)kratz(at)vistashare(dot)com>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Large time difference between explain analyze and normal run
Date: 2005-02-10 18:34:40
Message-ID: 200502101334.40341.chris.kratz@vistashare.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Does anyone have any idea why there be over a 4s difference between running
the statement directly and using explain analyze? Multiple runs give the
same result and I've tested on several servers.

db=# \timing
Timing is on.
db=# select count(*) from answer;
count
--------
530576
(1 row)

Time: 358.805 ms
db=# explain analyze select count(*) from answer;
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Aggregate (cost=9848.12..9848.12 rows=1 width=0) (actual
time=4841.231..4841.235 rows=1 loops=1)
-> Seq Scan on answer (cost=0.00..8561.29 rows=514729 width=0) (actual
time=0.011..2347.762 rows=530576 loops=1)
Total runtime: 4841.412 ms
(3 rows)

Time: 4855.712 ms

---

Postgresql 7.4.5 running on Linux 2.6.8.1

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-02-10 18:58:37 Re: Large time difference between explain analyze and normal run
Previous Message Jeff 2005-02-10 13:21:09 Re: Benchmark