| From: | Kenneth Marshall <ktm(at)it(dot)is(dot)rice(dot)edu> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6) |
| Date: | 2004-12-03 20:33:10 |
| Message-ID: | 20041203203310.GG8029@it.is.rice.edu |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 03, 2004 at 03:20:48PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> > 1. Buildfarm doesn't yet have that many platforms on it.
>
> It's not as bad as all that. Our current list of supported platforms
> (ie, things that got tested last time) is
>
> AIX
> Free/Open/NetBSD covered by buildfarm
> HPUX used daily by moi
> IRIX
> Linux covered by buildfarm
> OS X tested pretty often by moi
> Solaris covered by buildfarm
> Tru64
> UnixWare
> Windows/Cygwin covered by buildfarm
>
> With respect to hardware it's
>
> x86 covered by buildfarm
> ia64
> x86_64 covered by buildfarm
> ARM
> Alpha
> MIPS covered by buildfarm
> m68k
> PA-RISC used daily by moi
> PPC tested pretty often by moi
> RS6000 isn't this same as PPC?
This is the IBM Power4 and now Power5 architecture which is
different from the PowerPC.
Ken
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2004-12-03 20:37:42 | Re: Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6) |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2004-12-03 20:20:48 | Buildfarm coverage (was Re: OK, ready for RC1 or Beta6) |