| From: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Call for 7.5 feature completion |
| Date: | 2004-05-20 03:16:36 |
| Message-ID: | 20040520001436.A5739@ganymede.hub.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 19 May 2004, Andrew Dunstan wrote:
> > Why not have seperate branches in CVS for each version? Branch on
> > similar dates to the core distribution itself?
> >
>
> And thus demolish your argument that it is in the interests of projects to
> have independent release dates. And make the task more complex.
How do you figure that? If you do a 7.4 branch of a project, around the
same time as 7.4 of PostgreSQL, you have code that is specific to that
release that you can apply patches/improvements to. By being a seperate
project, you don't hvae to wait for 7.4.1 to be released in order to
release a new version of the project ... I'm not even say call it a 7.4
branch ... just associate it with it ...
----
Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org)
Email: scrappy(at)hub(dot)org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2004-05-20 03:18:22 | Re: [HACKERS] pgmex, a MATLAB interface for PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Oliver Jowett | 2004-05-20 03:00:26 | Delaying the planning of unnamed statements until Bind |