Re: Two weeks to feature freeze

From: The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl(at)familyhealth(dot)com(dot)au>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Date: 2003-06-22 03:35:55
Message-ID: 20030622003448.H51411@hub.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, 21 Jun 2003, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> What does bother me is that we weren't getting any closer on those
> _hard_ items. At least with this release, we will be _closer_ on Win32
> and PITR.

Maybe our problem is such a ... hatred of #ifdef? Maybe its time to go
back a bit to our roots ... get the 'experimental features' in with #ifdef
so that others have a chance to look at and work on it, and once ready for
prime time, pull the #ifdef's out ... ?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-06-22 03:43:09 Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
Previous Message David Brown 2003-06-22 03:13:57 PQfreemem??