| From: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: creating index names automatically? |
| Date: | 2009-12-23 19:26:18 |
| Message-ID: | 1d4e0c10912231126x52d85a1dscacdd7173dd5172b@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> I'm still not really eager to introduce yet another category of
> keywords, but perhaps it is worth doing. Comments?
If we consider that they can now be a problem in pl/pgsql, it might be
a good idea to consider it for this release.
(I'm thinking of
http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/17728.1261002579@sss.pgh.pa.us
for instance)
--
Guillaume
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2009-12-23 19:53:50 | Re: Removing pg_migrator limitations |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-23 19:17:32 | Re: Removing pg_migrator limitations |