Re: [HACKERS] Anyone for prettyprinted EXPLAIN VERBOSE?

From: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jan Wieck <wieck(at)debis(dot)com>
Cc: tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Anyone for prettyprinted EXPLAIN VERBOSE?
Date: 1999-12-18 01:59:28
Message-ID: 199912180159.UAA22368@candle.pha.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Who really USES the explanative format to debug things on
> non-trivial queries?
>
> Since Tom is asking, I assume at least he's the one who does.
> But then again, he must be able to see his target station
> expressed in some Expr-, Oper- and Func- nodes while pushing
> the buttons to get an underground-ticket. So who else does
> like the pretty printed version better for non-esthetical
> reasons?
>

I prefer pretty-print. I view it in the server log files, and go node
by node until I find the problem.

--
Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle
maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us | (610) 853-3000
+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue
+ Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tatsuo Ishii 1999-12-18 02:06:32 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Notation for nextval() (was Re: Several small patches)
Previous Message Jeroen van Vianen 1999-12-18 01:59:17 SIGSEGV in initdb