Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management
Date: 2009-12-07 06:21:40
Message-ID: 18088.1260166900@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> Given the above, I don't understand why writing this patch was deemed
> worthwhile in the first place,

It was written and submitted by one person who did not bother to ask
first whether anyone else thought it was worthwhile. So its presence
on the CF list should not be taken as evidence that there's consensus
for it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-12-07 06:26:35 Re: New VACUUM FULL
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-12-07 06:19:14 Re: [patch] pg_ctl init extension