Re: [patch] pg_ctl init extension

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [patch] pg_ctl init extension
Date: 2009-12-07 06:19:14
Message-ID: 18043.1260166754@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> The biggest problem is that all of the places that used to say
> "<command><initdb>" when talking about creating a cluster now just say
> "database cluster initialization"--with no link to a section covering
> that topic. That's not a good forward step. The part I'm more
> favorable toward that I expect other people to really cringe at is that
> the examples showing how to manually run initdb have all been switched
> to use "pg_ctl initdb" too.

That's easily dealt with ;-) ... just rip out all those parts of the
diff. I think all that needs to be done in the docs is to list the initdb
option in the pg_ctl reference page.

If you think it's code-complete, let's just commit the code and not
try to have a re-education project going on with the docs.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-12-07 06:21:40 Re: YAML Was: CommitFest status/management
Previous Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2009-12-07 06:12:39 bug: json format and auto_explain